[Takwa]

Hi got an e-mail few days ago saying one of my site had "objectionable content" and that I need to take all cj ads off that site or I be Struck off.

I did as were told took alll the cj ads from that site, 48 hours later an e-mail told me I have been banned from CJ.

What a joke, what's the point of the first e-mail then? also they said they will charge back all the money they gave me. Scammers!!!

Anyway forget about them, anyone recommend another affiliate that talks with reasons?

[zach]

You should try emailing them and asking them to sort out the issue.

Tell them that you cooperated and removed the content as they requested.

[Takwa]

Sorry not begging them, not risking it again.
I had got info from another forum, a guy been with them for 7 years and is being checked.
you shouldn't wait till they get you too

[Taggart]

Originally Posted by Takwa

Hi got an e-mail few days ago saying one of my site had "objectionable content" and that I need to take all cj ads off that site or I be Struck off.

I'm sorry to hear about that Takwa. I notice that the site has some very high profile advertisers.

If you don't mind me asking, what do you think their problem was with your content to make it "objectionable"?

[SageMother]

Originally Posted by Takwa

Hi got an e-mail few days ago saying one of my site had "objectionable content" and that I need to take all cj ads off that site or I be Struck off.

I did as were told took alll the cj ads from that site, 48 hours later an e-mail told me I have been banned from CJ.

What a joke, what's the point of the first e-mail then? also they said they will charge back all the money they gave me. Scammers!!!

Anyway forget about them, anyone recommend another affiliate that talks with reasons?

Which site did they say had the objectionable content? Just looking at those in your signature, I can think of a couple of reasons content may have been found objectionable.

There may have been "2257" issues that CJ didn't want to deal with.

[RFL1986]

Isn't this something that they should noticed before accepting you though? If it's objectionable content then that's OK but they need to let their users beware before signing up with them and having to deal with these kind of headaches.

[justontime]

If they accepted Takwa's site(s) in the first place, I don't see how they can justify clawing back money due from advertising before Takwa was made aware that they had a problem with objectionable content. I could understand it if Takwa had added the objectionable content after registering with CJ, but it doesn't seem as if that is what happened.

[jazzgrrl]

It seems like there is something more to this story. Maybe it was a misunderstanding. What was the objectable content? Good question, justontime. Was it added after registering?

[Takwa]

Which site did they say had the objectionable content? Just looking at those in your signature, I can think of a couple of reasons content may have been found objectionable.

There may have been "2257" issues that CJ didn't want to deal with.

My site in question was www.sexy-oriental-girls.blogspot.com no porn btw

2257 issues??? what's it?

When add websites to cj.com it's done automatically, so they don't check it.

The only thing I don't understand is I followed their instruction from the warning e-mail, and still got taken off

Now no one from CJ is replying my e-mails

[justontime]

Originally Posted by Takwa

My site in question was www.sexy-oriental-girls.blogspot.com no porn btw

2257 issues??? what's it?

When add websites to cj.com it's done automatically, so they don't check it.

The only thing I don't understand is I followed their instruction from the warning e-mail, and still got taken off

Now no one from CJ is replying my e-mails

It does seem unfair that they will not even discuss the matter with you or give you a proper explanation. Is there any other way to make contact with them?